The Football Thread 2011/12

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Kanbei
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: Belfast

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Kanbei » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:41 pm

Atkinson isn't refereeing the match on Saturday now, withdrawn due to a virus \o/ (Halsey instead)

Redknapp at his trial saying he can't spell, "can't even fill in a team sheet properly".

I'm just going to leave that there...

User avatar
abcd
Emeritus
Joined in 2008
AKA: abcd

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by abcd » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:43 pm

This team sheet?

Image

Image
User avatar
tomvek
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
Location: N.Ireland
Contact:

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by tomvek » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:53 pm

The Barca/Madrid game was fantastic fun, can't believe Real didn't win this with the amount of chances they created. Dani Alves' goal :o

Also a big :wub: to Gerry Armstrong, he talks so much sense during the La Liga games especially about the terrible diving/play acting.

Image
Corazon de Leon

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Corazon de Leon » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:55 pm

I watched the Clasico in a pub filled with Spanish folk, which was split about 60/40 for Barca. Excellent atmosphere. :wub:

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by DML » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:56 pm

rudderless wrote:
DML wrote:The reasons the guidelines are in place is just SO teams cannot unfairly spend and buy players beyond the call of duty.


Exactly. Therefore we have equal rights with everyone else, and that's as it should be. In which case, doesn't it follow that we can complain just as much as anyone when we're light for whatever reason - particularly when in many cases, it's beyond our control?

City have failed to keep a settled camp for what ever reason


BELM. Tevez aside, team spirit is good. It's nothing to do with being 'unsettled'.

If the team doesnt win trophies, there can be no excuse


Well, yeah, there can. Every game we've lost this season has had a major refereeing decision go against us - often controversially. About the only game we've won where we were lucky to was the Spurs game. So we can point to poor officiating as the reason we're not still in the FA Cup and Carling Cup and why we're not further ahead in the Premier League. As well as the fact that we're still a work-in-progress. Last season we won the cup and finished fourth, which was beyond most expectations when many pundits still acknowledged we weren't the finished article. That we've been on top of the Premier League for much of this season is a big step up from top four, particularly when you haven't come anywhere near close before. We're not a club that is used to this kind of scenario. Over the years, the likes of United have gained experience and a mentality that can help them over the finishing line. We don't have that. If we lose the title, it'll be disappointing, but "disaster" is overstating it.

Also, on a second note, how do City fans feel about not being in Europe in two years time due to the Uefa rules coming in? Because there is no chance of them now complying with them?


That's not true. There's every chance of us complying with them. Why do you think we haven't bought anyone in this transfer window? We're preparing for two years' time.


Firstly I wouldn't say that last night was all that contraversial a decision, at match speed it definitely looked a penalty, only when slowed down did it become questionable, but you can't have the ball hit a totally outstretched arm and not expect the ref to call for a pen. Overall Liverpool were the better team over two legs.

Of course the Cup was a massive breakthrough, but fourth was not 'beyond' expectations for last season - it was purely where the team should be aiming. If you'd finished fifth or lower you would have been laughed out of England.

We can also look at Chelsea as a case study of teams who have recieved vast amounts of money quickly - they won titles almost straight away.

User avatar
Spindash
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: North West

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Spindash » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:02 pm

DML wrote:We can also look at Chelsea as a case study of teams who have recieved vast amounts of money quickly - they won titles almost straight away.


Chelsea finished in the top six for seven consecutive seasons before they were taken over.

User avatar
Minto
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland!

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Minto » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 pm

Any other 'pool fans on here heading to the final?

PSN: MintKorp - NNID: Mintoisking
User avatar
mcjihge2
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by mcjihge2 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:09 pm

Kanbei wrote:
Redknapp at his trial saying he can't spell, "can't even fill in a team sheet properly".


abcd wrote:This team sheet?

Image


That looks too neat for 'Arry, it must have been Rosie who wrote that.

Xbox Live: GCE
User avatar
Finiarél
Member
Joined in 2010
Location: Liverpool

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Finiarél » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:12 pm

Minto wrote:Any other 'pool fans on here heading to the final?


Me my old man and the family in law are trying to sort it out, So it's a maybe for me! :wub:
If not, will probably go the Albert with them lot :shifty: Real scousers

glowy69 wrote:Being from the hood won't save you from an alien mate.
User avatar
Minto
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland!

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Minto » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:14 pm

Finiarél wrote:
Minto wrote:Any other 'pool fans on here heading to the final?


Me my old man and the family in law are trying to sort it out, So it's a maybe for me! :wub:
If not, will probably go the Albert with them lot :shifty: Real scousers

:wub:

Booked my flights this morning as soon as I got home :lol:

Just need to get a ticket now :shifty:

PSN: MintKorp - NNID: Mintoisking
User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by DML » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:14 pm

Spindash wrote:
DML wrote:We can also look at Chelsea as a case study of teams who have recieved vast amounts of money quickly - they won titles almost straight away.


Chelsea finished in the top six for seven consecutive seasons before they were taken over.


I don't think the gap is as big as you have suggested between top six and top twelve, and you spent more money.

Last season, a Cup represented true success - the first one. Failing to win a trophy this year should rightly be considered a joke. That said, if you win the league, its a great, great victory - small margins and that! This is not a team built particularly naturally, so the same 'five year plan' should not apply. I am certainly not suggesting Man City should be in the Champions League final every season, but the absolute minimum every season for City should now be considered to be at least one trophy.

User avatar
Pancake
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Pancake » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:24 pm

rudderless wrote:Well, yeah, there can. Every game we've lost this season has had a major refereeing decision go against us - often controversially. About the only game we've won where we were lucky to was the Spurs game. So we can point to poor officiating as the reason we're not still in the FA Cup and Carling Cup and why we're not further ahead in the Premier League.


No no no no no no no. Just no. You could point to decisions in cup matches maybe (although I still find it a very lame excuse) but over the course of a very long league season it's absurd to believe that your team has been conned out of a better finish by poor officiating. It effects all teams equally, whether you want to see it that way or not!

User avatar
Spindash
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: North West

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Spindash » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:25 pm

DML wrote:
Spindash wrote:
DML wrote:We can also look at Chelsea as a case study of teams who have recieved vast amounts of money quickly - they won titles almost straight away.


Chelsea finished in the top six for seven consecutive seasons before they were taken over.


I don't think the gap is as big as you have suggested between top six and top twelve, and you spent more money.


City were in chaos before the takeover both on (losing the final game of the previous season 8-1) and off (former chairman paying wages out of his own pocket) the pitch, so it wasn't that simple. But that's gone now.

DML wrote:Last season, a Cup represented true success - the first one. Failing to win a trophy this year should rightly be considered a joke. That said, if you win the league, its a great, great victory - small margins and that! This is not a team built particularly naturally, so the same 'five year plan' should not apply. I am certainly not suggesting Man City should be in the Champions League final every season, but the absolute minimum every season for City should now be considered to be at least one trophy.


That's fair enough, but we've seen this season that anything can happen. If we do win the league this season, fantastic. If we don't then I won't be calling for heads to roll. The bigger picture is that we have an excellent young manager and a side which is growing together.

Glowy69
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: B6

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Glowy69 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:30 pm

Pancake wrote:
rudderless wrote:Well, yeah, there can. Every game we've lost this season has had a major refereeing decision go against us - often controversially. About the only game we've won where we were lucky to was the Spurs game. So we can point to poor officiating as the reason we're not still in the FA Cup and Carling Cup and why we're not further ahead in the Premier League.


No no no no no no no. Just no. You could point to decisions in cup matches maybe (although I still find it a very lame excuse) but over the course of a very long league season it's absurd to believe that your team has been conned out of a better finish by poor officiating. It effects all teams equally, whether you want to see it that way or not!


Poor reffing. :fp: I we are gonna be doing that, then I can comfortably say, we'd have qualified for the CL two seasons on the spin under MON, and won the league cup and got to the FA cup final. So thats a rubbish reason Im afraid, everyone gets gooseberry fool decisions.

Spinny is probably the most level headed city fan on here, and I can probably say with some confidence that he was gutted last night, Id have been mortified, I know I was when we lost to united even though they had a better team.

You want all the success you can get for your team. And city not winning something this year would be disastrous. It will be interesting to see how many players Mancini brings in in the summer

Fabian Delph is a banana split.

Drumstick wrote:I'll go on record in stating that Villa won't finish inside the top 6 this season.

Image
Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Skippy » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:33 pm

rudderless wrote:Well, yeah, there can. Every game we've lost this season has had a major refereeing decision go against us - often controversially.


Sounding like a United fan there. That is what City are becoming though so I guess it's no surprise.

User avatar
TigaSefi
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by TigaSefi » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:35 pm

Minto wrote:
Finiarél wrote:
Minto wrote:Any other 'pool fans on here heading to the final?


Me my old man and the family in law are trying to sort it out, So it's a maybe for me! :wub:
If not, will probably go the Albert with them lot :shifty: Real scousers

:wub:

Booked my flights this morning as soon as I got home :lol:

Just need to get a ticket now :shifty:


Getting a ticket or two is a priority. May even go down the £300 a ticket route :shifty:

Image
1 > 2 > 3 >>>>>>> 4 >>>>> 5
User avatar
Spindash
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: North West

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Spindash » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:36 pm

Skippy wrote:
rudderless wrote:Well, yeah, there can. Every game we've lost this season has had a major refereeing decision go against us - often controversially.


Sounding like a United fan there. That is what City are becoming though so I guess it's no surprise.


Just for posterity:

Skippy wrote:Here we go, my last 45 mins of Arsenal football for quite some time unless things change

I think I'm going to stop watching live but continue to follow until I see changes on and off the pitch

That's me done with Arsenal for the foreseeable future

Glowy69
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: B6

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Glowy69 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:38 pm

Skippy :lol: :lol:

Turning your back on your club :evil: What a strawberry floating retarded thing to do. You lot up in the top 4/5 of the league at like spoilt brats sometimes

Fabian Delph is a banana split.

Drumstick wrote:I'll go on record in stating that Villa won't finish inside the top 6 this season.

Image
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Photek » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:40 pm

I have the same opinion of Arsenal fans, they just can't seem to understand that they are not what they once where and so, boo the gooseberry fool out of there own players.

Poor Arshavin, im trying to remember a Liverpool player that was Booed onto thep pitch.

Image
Glowy69
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: B6

PostRe: The Football Thread 2011/12
by Glowy69 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:43 pm

Our spacker fans boo our players. But then a lot of our fans thinks its 2008 still :fp: Thats why our away form is better than our home form, Stephen Warnock got boo'd when he touched the ball. I went strawberry floating mental at the people around me :evil:

Fabian Delph is a banana split.

Drumstick wrote:I'll go on record in stating that Villa won't finish inside the top 6 this season.

Image

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dowbocop, floydfreak, poshrule_uk, Rawrgna, Squinty, wensleydale and 549 guests