The Star Trek Spoilers Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Hexx » Thu May 07, 2009 10:12 pm

MCN wrote:
Hexx wrote:Yes - which should have been news to everyone (no one's seen a Romulan!). Except it was ignored :lol:

/geek.


You're really scraping the barrel now, Hexx. The camera was pointed at Spock's face, so you couldn't see anyone's reactions. Plus, how do we know it was news anyway? For all we know, it could have been common knowledge.


Not really :P

Because it's been shown before that it wasn't?

Besides it's a minor point that only die hard trekkies will pick up (they're FURIOUS over the seemingly Stardate mix up :D).

But it's symptomatic of the film - it's neither an amazing action film, or an amazing Star Trek film. It's hobbled by attempting to be a mis match of both.

It actually seems to be doing best with "Casual Trekkies" who can now be un-ashamed. :lol:

User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:14 pm

Hexx wrote:
MCN wrote:
Hexx wrote:Yes - which should have been news to everyone (no one's seen a Romulan!). Except it was ignored :lol:

/geek.


You're really scraping the barrel now, Hexx. The camera was pointed at Spock's face, so you couldn't see anyone's reactions. Plus, how do we know it was news anyway? For all we know, it could have been common knowledge.


Not really :P

Because it's been shown before that it wasn't?

Besides it's a minor point that only die hard trekkies will pick up (they're FURIOUS over the seemingly Stardate mix up :D).

But it's symptomatic of the film - it's neither an amazing action film, or an amazing Star Trek film. It's hobbled by attempting to be a mis match of both.


As I've said before, this is a new timeline, so you have to ignore previous canon. In previous canon, Amanda is still alive, and Vulcan is still intact.

Image
User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Peter Crisp » Thu May 07, 2009 10:16 pm

The fact that Vulcan is part of the Federation and has been since the start it's safe to assume they may have told some people about the Romulan's. It may not be common knowledge among the general public but I should imagine people high up in Starfleet would know just in case they encountered them.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Hexx » Thu May 07, 2009 10:20 pm

MCN wrote:As I've said before, this is a new timeline, so you have to ignore previous canon. In previous canon, Amanda is still alive, and Vulcan is still intact.


Not a new timeline when the Kelvin first meets though :o

Oh wait. Switch brain off. Just believe what film tells you (such as it takes 4 times longer to get from Vulcan to Earth than other way :P)

Let's not even get started on direction/editing (I knew in the first 10minutes I wasn't gonna like this aspect of the filum ;))

User avatar
Oh Teh Noes
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mina Murray
Location: HMS Camden Lock

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Oh Teh Noes » Thu May 07, 2009 10:24 pm

ITT: Hexx is wrong.

Dr Cottle wrote:My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:25 pm

Hexx wrote:
MCN wrote:As I've said before, this is a new timeline, so you have to ignore previous canon. In previous canon, Amanda is still alive, and Vulcan is still intact.


Not a new timeline when the Kelvin first meets though :o


The point when the "lightening storm" first appears is the start of a new timeline, as it simply wouldn't have happened in established canon. The Kelvin investigates the storm, Kirk takes command, rams the romulan ship, and it all goes from there. They've even covered themselves for the old "assignment badge" question there, as they can simply say that Starfleet used the arrowhead symbol to celebrate the Kelvin and George Kirk's sacrifice at an earlier time than previously established.

Image
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:25 pm

Oh Teh Noes wrote:ITT: Hexx is wrong.


Agreed.

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Hexx » Thu May 07, 2009 10:28 pm

MCN wrote:
Hexx wrote:
MCN wrote:As I've said before, this is a new timeline, so you have to ignore previous canon. In previous canon, Amanda is still alive, and Vulcan is still intact.


Not a new timeline when the Kelvin first meets though :o


The point when the "lightening storm" first appears is the start of a new timeline, as it simply wouldn't have happened in established canon. T


Yep - Also the first chance those people would have seen Romulans...but that's ignored.

As I said it's only something a die-hard trekkie would get worked up over - and that's not who this film is catering for - As I said before - it could work as a "totally new story", or as an "in continuity story" - but they made it a hodge podge combination and film suffers for it.

There's far worse flaws in the film than that

Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Skippy » Thu May 07, 2009 10:32 pm

I award the world's first Prequel/Sequel/Reboot the highest *** ever awarded to a film by me.

Hugely entertaining due to an amazing cast but the film on a whole seemed a bit messy, I'm not sure how to put it. Basing the story around making it a reboot was a great idea but it seemed like they strived for that too much. I can't put it into words, I guess I have to see it again

User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:35 pm

PsychoPriest wrote:I award the world's first Prequel/Sequel/Reboot the highest *** ever awarded to a film by me.

Hugely entertaining due to an amazing cast but the film on a whole seemed a bit messy, I'm not sure how to put it. Basing the story around making it a reboot was a great idea but it seemed like they strived for that too much. I can't put it into words, I guess I have to see it again


The trick here is not to think of it as a reboot, but to consider it as an alternate timeline. As I said before, quite clever, as they can now do what they want with it, without messing up established canon.

Image
User avatar
LewisD
#grcadesangle
Joined in 2008
AKA: L3wisD
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Contact:

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by LewisD » Thu May 07, 2009 10:38 pm

So, I'm wanting to watch this new film, having never really been into star trek.

But why the strawberry float can't I find any torrrents?

User avatar
gaminglegend
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: North East, UK

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by gaminglegend » Thu May 07, 2009 10:39 pm

MCN wrote:
PsychoPriest wrote:I award the world's first Prequel/Sequel/Reboot the highest *** ever awarded to a film by me.

Hugely entertaining due to an amazing cast but the film on a whole seemed a bit messy, I'm not sure how to put it. Basing the story around making it a reboot was a great idea but it seemed like they strived for that too much. I can't put it into words, I guess I have to see it again


The trick here is not to think of it as a reboot, but to consider it as an alternate timeline. As I said before, quite clever, as they can now do what they want with it, without messing up established canon.

well sort of the same thing isn't it? reboot/alternate timeline, because that why the film was made, to kick start the franchise again. Reboot with new actors playing characters, and this alternate timeline is at least in paraphrase a reboot of the original series so far as being able to create new stories and characters in the future.

Check out the GRCADE Beer Money Thread - Free shares & Bank Switch Offers £££! :msgreen:
https://grcade.co.uk/t:the-making-beer-money-thread
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:40 pm

LewisD wrote:So, I'm wanting to watch this new film, having never really been into star trek.

But why the strawberry float can't I find any torrrents?


Give it time, the advance screenings were only today.

Also, did anyone else watch it expecting a big Deus Ex Machina at the end that never came? I think that surprised me more than anything else, and it showed that it was no longer Brannon Braga in charge.

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Hexx » Thu May 07, 2009 10:40 pm

PsychoPriest wrote:I award the world's first Prequel/Sequel/Reboot the highest *** ever awarded to a film by me.

Hugely entertaining due to an amazing cast but the film on a whole seemed a bit messy, I'm not sure how to put it. Basing the story around making it a reboot was a great idea but it seemed like they strived for that too much. I can't put it into words, I guess I have to see it again


I'd agree witha 3/5 or 6/10 rating. :)

The trick here is not to think of it as a reboot, but to consider it as an alternate timeline


Yes - but the film spends alot of time a) explaining((or more to the point depending on) the continuity it's in and b) explaining how it's a reboot.

And it suffers for it. If they'd just done a straight "new story" - it would likely have been much stronger. But due to the time/effort to show it's an "in continutiy reboot" (if there is such a thing ;)), the film suffers.

User avatar
LewisD
#grcadesangle
Joined in 2008
AKA: L3wisD
Location: Reading, Berkshire
Contact:

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by LewisD » Thu May 07, 2009 10:44 pm

MCN wrote:
LewisD wrote:So, I'm wanting to watch this new film, having never really been into star trek.

But why the strawberry float can't I find any torrrents?


Give it time, the advance screenings were only today.


Ah my bad... thought it'd been out for a week or so... :shifty:

User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:45 pm

As far as I'm aware, this is the first time ever that a series has tried the alternative timeline approach to new films, so you can probably forgive them a little time to explain it.

Image
Skippy
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Skippy » Thu May 07, 2009 10:46 pm

MCN wrote:As far as I'm aware, this is the first time ever that a series has tried the alternative timeline approach to new films, so you can probably forgive them a little time to explain it.


Well it's probably the only series that could explain it :lol:

I don't see that working for Batman or Bond ;)

User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:49 pm


Image
User avatar
Oh Teh Noes
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mina Murray
Location: HMS Camden Lock

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by Oh Teh Noes » Thu May 07, 2009 10:49 pm

I also thought it was clever that they'd opted for the alternate timeline. They can pretty much do whatever the strawberry float they want now.

Within reason.

Dr Cottle wrote:My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.
User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Star Trek Spoilers Thread
by SEP » Thu May 07, 2009 10:51 pm

Oh Teh Noes wrote:I also thought it was clever that they'd opted for the alternate timeline. They can pretty much do whatever the strawberry float they want now.

Within reason.


Of course. They have stated that they intend to keep true to the characters' personalities. But anything else, really, is fair game, as far as I can see.

Image

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PuppetBoy and 212 guests