satriales wrote:[/spoiler]Was I right to call the raise pre-flop? Obvously if the 2 didn't show up then I would have not put any more money in but I'm just wondering if in the long term I should have folded there?
Then no. You want to set mine if you are calling < 10% of your stack and they have you covered because you make your set like 10% of the time. Even then though you don't stack them. The fact that you say you will not put anymore money if unless a two comes means you should deffo be folding pre. Why can 22 now be a winning hand? Why can he not just have two over cards? You have to have a plan when you play which means not folding postflop without a 2 a certain %. You need to remember you are OOP here. So you are telling me you check fold any flop that doesn't have a 2 in it? If I am playing against you then I 3bet you hard since I know you call with so much of your range now and then cbet 100% of flops. You're basically giving them money by calling with that mentality.
Note I am not saying folding 22 is bad postflop. In many situations he may have you beaten and at these stakes perhaps more so but if you are not confident playing 22 for some sort of showdown value or check raising etc then you definitely need to fold it preflop OOP. Remember when you are OOP with a hand and someone raises you, you need to fold or 4bet almost always.
http://www.warwickpoker.com/forums/topi ... picid=4009Read this topic, reminded me of your hand a little despite him being in position and there being two others involved.
Nova wrote:$1000 GET!
I really wish I'd recorded that session, I ran pretty well but made some really observant plays, making me +$75 ish up in 90 minutes
$25NL is the limit for me, I'm playing really nicely at that level atm.
haha $25NL is crushing me. Got a graph? >_> Video?