The Inconspicuous, unsuspicious thread. (MCT)

She is just standing there with her mad fur burger staring at you.

She could have at least tidied up her room and her bush.

Don't get me wrong, it's not that I didn't appreciate the picture. I just think that a public forum isn't an appropriate place to post it.

The Disney Channel has far to many hot, young girls in tv roles, such as Emily Osment and Selena Gomez, not that I'm complaining!

teh bork wrote:The Disney Channel has far to many hot, young girls in tv roles, such as Emily Osment and Selena Gomez, not that I'm complaining!

MCN wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Nude pictures are not tolerated on GRcade, even if spoiler boxed.

And there are a shitload of them in another thread! FFS.

JiggerJay wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Flange is not allowed, legal or not!

Except in The Babe Thread, where a weird Bermuda Triangle/Somali Government paradox type thing laughs in the face of petty things like 'rules' and spits them back at you in a flurry of ginger pubes.

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Nude pictures are not tolerated on GRcade, even if spoiler boxed.

And there are a shitload of them in another thread! FFS.

I don't go in that thread, and I don't make the rules. All I can do is advise people to remove thgs that I know break them. If you have dispute, take it up with the people who do make the rules.

Skarjo wrote:Except in The Babe Thread, where a weird Bermuda Triangle/Somali Government paradox type thing laughs in the face of petty things like 'rules' and spits them back at you in a flurry of ginger pubes.

I guess the logical thing to do would be to post that Vanessa nudey picture in the babe thread. Purely for academic interest, you understand. Not so that we can easily access some photo of a Disney starlet with her clothes off. Dear me, no. Perish the thought.

MCN wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Nude pictures are not tolerated on GRcade, even if spoiler boxed.

And there are a shitload of them in another thread! FFS.

I don't go in that thread, and I don't make the rules. All I can do is advise people to remove thgs that I know break them. If you have dispute, take it up with the people who do make the rules.

Ah I see... it's that kind of place GRcade is.

So if I post that picture in that thread, then I wouldn't get banned?

As good old Spock would have said: It is not logical, Jim.

JK wrote:

Skarjo wrote:Except in The Babe Thread, where a weird Bermuda Triangle/Somali Government paradox type thing laughs in the face of petty things like 'rules' and spits them back at you in a flurry of ginger pubes.

I guess the logical thing to do would be to post that Vanessa nudey picture in the babe thread. Purely for academic interest, you understand. Not so that we can easily access some photo of a Disney starlet with her clothes off. Dear me, no. Perish the thought.

Jesus, just google the bloody thing. That's how I found it!

JK wrote:

Skarjo wrote:Except in The Babe Thread, where a weird Bermuda Triangle/Somali Government paradox type thing laughs in the face of petty things like 'rules' and spits them back at you in a flurry of ginger pubes.

I guess the logical thing to do would be to post that Vanessa nudey picture in the babe thread. Purely for academic interest, you understand. Not so that we can easily access some photo of a Disney starlet with her clothes off. Dear me, no. Perish the thought.

No chance from me! I've already felt the ban hammer once for a risky pic.

I'll let someone else show you her rubbish genitals.

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Nude pictures are not tolerated on GRcade, even if spoiler boxed.

And there are a shitload of them in another thread! FFS.

I don't go in that thread, and I don't make the rules. All I can do is advise people to remove thgs that I know break them. If you have dispute, take it up with the people who do make the rules.

Ah I see... it's that kind of place GRcade is.

So if I post that picture in that thread, then I wouldn't get banned?

As good old Spock would have said: It is not logical, Jim.

I think only Gandalf actually moderates the Babe thread, and the only line he draws is 'Would I be Arrested?'.

I've already seen it using the power of [famous search engine]. I was actually proposing an experiment of purely scientific merit.

What do you guys take me for, some kind of drooling pervert?

Skarjo wrote:I'll let someone else show you her rubbish genitals.

I wouldn't say they're rubbish. Yes, there is pubic hair there, but it's hardly the amazon rainforest, and what's wrong with a bit of pubic hair?

Skarjo wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Wedgie wrote:

MCN wrote:

Jonathan86 wrote:

MCN wrote:Wedgie, I'd remove that if I were you.

Why? She's 20 now, and was 18 when the pictures came to public attention

Nude pictures are not tolerated on GRcade, even if spoiler boxed.

And there are a shitload of them in another thread! FFS.

I don't go in that thread, and I don't make the rules. All I can do is advise people to remove thgs that I know break them. If you have dispute, take it up with the people who do make the rules.

Ah I see... it's that kind of place GRcade is.

So if I post that picture in that thread, then I wouldn't get banned?

As good old Spock would have said: It is not logical, Jim.

I think only Gandalf actually moderates the Babe thread, and the only line he draws is 'Would I be Arrested?'.

...

...

...

...

Again, not logical.

MCN wrote:

Skarjo wrote:I'll let someone else show you her rubbish genitals.

I wouldn't say they're rubbish. Yes, there is pubic hair there, but it's hardly the amazon rainforest, and what's wrong with a bit of pubic hair?

Makes it harder to pretend she's underage, obviously.

Wedgie wrote:
Ah I see... it's that kind of place GRcade is.

So if I post that picture in that thread, then I wouldn't get banned?

As good old Spock would have said: It is not logical, Jim.

I appreciate your attempts to appeal to the Trekkie that I am, but like I said, it's not me who makes the rules. Please understand that when I said to remove it, I was acting purely in your best interests. You're a good guy, and the last thing I'd want to see is you getting banned. Especially considering all the other gooseberry fool that's been going on between you and the mother of your child recently.

All I'm saying, really, is to err on the side of caution. Don't take risks here, as they have a habit of backfiring.

There are some shows on Nickelodeon that just seem to have some pretty dirty overtones as well, like that iCarly show.

The entire Disney Channel is ephebophile heaven.