Britain's Got Talent - IT'S FINISHED, ITV1

MCN wrote:

Jaxley wrote:If the audience wanted a more sophisticated act, they would not have watched BGT.

What, pray tell, would they have watched?

Well I'm sure I don't know.

Maybe something less cheesy, this show is more about numb entertainment. Something sophisticated, something at the theatre maybe, I'm no expert.

Susan being so gracious in defeat was such a big FU to all the haters .

Jaxley wrote:

MCN wrote:

Jaxley wrote:If the audience wanted a more sophisticated act, they would not have watched BGT.

What, pray tell, would they have watched?

Well I'm sure I don't know.

Maybe something less cheesy, this show is more about numb entertainment. Something sophisticated, something at the theatre maybe, I'm no expert.

Not much of a choice on TV. And going to the theatre every Saturday night is not a very practical (or affordable) suggestion.

jamcc wrote:

Sandycoin wrote:Did you boo when Amanda said they blew Flawless out of the water?

No. I'm sat at home. There would be no point. Besides, Amanda's a ******* retard ("the rope was burning the wrong way!"); does anyone actually give a **** about what she thinks?

Lol, no idea how she managed to get on the panel.

http://www.oddspreview.com/category/Ent ... 905280013/

Seriously guys, watch Flawless' performance again:



AMAZING. Honestly think they were better than Diversity. Just watch it. Incredible routine.

What happened to stavros?

glowy69 wrote:What happened to stavros?

Haven't you heard?

Heart attack. Right on stage.

To think they carried on with the show is sickening. Sickening.

The Flawless performence was too stop start, and the music and the flow just irritated me. It was like a bunch of seperate dance routines that didn't merge together well.

Also they didn't do a transformers thing.

Unfortunatley I saw their act, I thought they would run away with it. Literally.

Yes, Flawless were great and their routine was more a whole than diversity's sketch-approach but man, Man;



- Diversity's entertainment factor and creativeness (Robots FTW!) gave it the X-Factor of surprise.

And i've found that with both groups, repeat viewings only serve to highlight all the awesome details you miss first time round.

But why does everyone diss Aidan? He had skillz and i really looked forward to his performances after his audition. Saying he's just 'another' JT-alike is some serious retardation.

Overall great show tonight, i found all the acts genuinely enjoyable and worthy.

Sandycoin wrote:The Flawless performence was too stop start, and the music and the flow just irritated me. It was like a bunch of seperate dance routines that didn't merge together well.

Also they didn't do a transformers thing.

I thought it was awesome having an MJ medley. The thing I don't get is that Flawless are technically better dancers than Diversity (I don't think many would argue against that), though people put Diversity ahead based on their routines... Whereas with singers, say, it is all about the technical side of the performance, as their equivalent of the choreography (the song) is already written for them.

That's why I think it's insane to pit a dance group against a singer, as dance groups have to put in soooooooooooooooo much more effort and practice. A naturally good singer could pretty much perform on the spot. Dance act? They would be strawberry floating awful without practice and training.

Having just watched it Again, that Breathing bit is the shizzle.

deathofcows wrote:But why does everyone diss Aidan? He had skillz and i really looked forward to his performances after his audition. Saying he's just 'another' JT-alike is some serious retardation.

Because they're strawberry floating idiots.

He's a 12 year old kid, who did all his own chereography with (as far as I'm aware) no trainers or anything and he had less than 24 hours to prepare.

I think he did staggeringly well. He's an incredibly good dancer. Hope he goes far and I'm sure he will.

Flawless may be technically better dancers, but they're boring. The first 10 seconds of their routine was interesting, but then it was like, 'Wow, sure these guys can obviously dance, but.. It's dull'. Diversity are leagues ahead in that respect. Quite how anyone could confuse that kid with the afro with a girl, I don't know.

What we need is a dance off between the two groups with 'Let's see you dance sucka, you got nothing on me!' playing in the background.

Saxamaphone? Sure he's a great sax player.. Should he be on a TV variety talent show? I don't think so.

Final thought, any straight male that wouldn't slam Amanda six ways from Sunday is infact, a homosexual.

Igor wrote:Flawless may be technically better dancers, but they're boring. The first 10 seconds of their routine was interesting, but then it was like, 'Wow, sure these guys can obviously dance, but.. It's dull'. Diversity are leagues ahead in that respect. Quite how anyone could confuse that kid with the afro with a girl, I don't know.

What we need is a dance off between the two groups with 'Let's see you dance sucka, you got nothing on me!' playing in the background.

Saxamaphone? Sure he's a great sax player.. Should he be on a TV variety talent show? I don't think so.

Final thought, any straight male that wouldn't slam Amanda six ways from Sunday is infact, a homosexual.

I thought the lad was a girl, honestly. And also I wouldn't go anywhere near Holden with my willy. She's not my type by any stretch of the imagination and to shag her would be seen to endorse her false life. I could cover her in enough paste to wallpaper the Albert Hall though.

Stavros Flatley should have blatently won. The guys are legends.

jamcc wrote:

Sandycoin wrote:The Flawless performence was too stop start, and the music and the flow just irritated me. It was like a bunch of seperate dance routines that didn't merge together well.

Also they didn't do a transformers thing.

I thought it was awesome having an MJ medley. The thing I don't get is that Flawless are technically better dancers than Diversity (I don't think many would argue against that), though people put Diversity ahead based on their routines... Whereas with singers, say, it is all about the technical side of the performance, as their equivalent of the choreography (the song) is already written for them.

That's why I think it's insane to pit a dance group against a singer, as dance groups have to put in soooooooooooooooo much more effort and practice. A naturally good singer could pretty much perform on the spot. Dance act? They would be ******* awful without practice and training.

Yeah, there needs to be more singer/songwriters on this programme i think.
Trouble is, when self proclaimed "pretty boy" rugby player gets a record deal, he'll just do covers. If they actually had someone who wrote their own songs, they could be huge. But then again, there is no reason why they would need this compettition in the first place.
Need more people like this fella- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7ijwEwAvdo

Mommy wrote:

Igor wrote:Flawless may be technically better dancers, but they're boring. The first 10 seconds of their routine was interesting, but then it was like, 'Wow, sure these guys can obviously dance, but.. It's dull'. Diversity are leagues ahead in that respect. Quite how anyone could confuse that kid with the afro with a girl, I don't know.

What we need is a dance off between the two groups with 'Let's see you dance sucka, you got nothing on me!' playing in the background.

Saxamaphone? Sure he's a great sax player.. Should he be on a TV variety talent show? I don't think so.

Final thought, any straight male that wouldn't slam Amanda six ways from Sunday is infact, a homosexual.

I thought the lad was a girl, honestly. And also I wouldn't go anywhere near Holden with my willy. She's not my type by any stretch of the imagination and to shag her would be seen to endorse her false life. I could cover her in enough paste to wallpaper the Albert Hall though.

That kid with the afro reminded me of Claudio Sanchez from Coheed and Cambria