Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590

One suggestion: No name changes allowed for players while they're in the game?

Gorrable wrote:
Falsey wrote:Isnt the best strategy for a blue to appear inactive? That way they can go about their evil deeds without arousing suspicion.

That's what I'm thinking - no-one's going to vote for/nominate someone who hasn't posted much. On the other hand, if an otherwise active member becomes randomally inactive, that might raise suspicion.

On the other hand, that strategy works for non-bluehats too. Remain quiet, and no-one will vote you out, and you're less likely to get noticed by the bluehats. So really, no-one should be posting at all...

It never works like that, though.

MCN wrote:
A J Styles wrote:Time to get my first post in before the thread turns into spamming city.

I see you still have a uniformed avatar from the classic AYAW in space we had last year.

I had the awesome Godot one. I'd love to remember who made that.
Actually, I'm going to try and find it again.

aaronayl1 wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:
Pacman wrote:
aaronayl1 wrote:Herbi for the lynch first, I reckon, after his fake tantrum in the other thread.

I too agree.

His tantrum was fake = He's a bluehat.
His tantrum was real = We'd rather play with people who don't throw tantrums.

I dunno, hilariously childish tantrum or not like Poncho said he would be a good regular member to have around. Plus it's never a good thing to just kill off any regular member.

But he said he's lost interest. Thus won't be around.

So then let him get wiped out the game for being an inactive, don't waste a lynching slot just because to decided to throw a wobbly.

And it's the perfect cover as to why he's gone inactive (now he's a wolf) after so many games being active.

We have our first bluehat, ladies and gentlemen.

Maybe, but he was bitching about the game and how he was hesitant to sign up as it was.

I'm willing to bet this is just Herbi being Herbi rather than Herbi being a bluehat. I want to see who Mori thinks is a 'hat, since he seems pretty sure of it.

Clarkman wrote:One suggestion: No name changes allowed for players while they're in the game?

Sounds like a good idea, it's going to be hard to keep track of everyone with so many players as it is.

Gorrable wrote:
Falsey wrote:Isnt the best strategy for a blue to appear inactive? That way they can go about their evil deeds without arousing suspicion.

That's what I'm thinking - no-one's going to vote for/nominate someone who hasn't posted much. On the other hand, if an otherwise active member becomes randomally inactive, that might raise suspicion.

On the other hand, that strategy works for non-bluehats too. Remain quiet, and no-one will vote you out, and you're less likely to get noticed by the bluehats. So really, no-one should be posting at all...

Given that this thread will be enormous by midnight, we're clearly all morons.

I see..

Im off into my bunker now, See you all after the game. Good job I had my tinfoil hat ready.

Drumstick wrote:Four PMs already.

One could say this is a very strong attempt to look part of a "pro member" group...

It's almost suspicious...

8-)

I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

PsychicSykes wrote:
Clarkman wrote:One suggestion: No name changes allowed for players while they're in the game?

Sounds like a good idea, it's going to be hard to keep track of everyone with so many players as it is.

Anyone who changes their name is obviously a bluehat trying to make it harder for us innocent non-bluehats.

The best post I've read tonight was Poncho's, regarding Herbi's experience and how he could be a valuable player.

FatDaz wrote:I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

*looks at avatar*

Last edited by Infibeyen on Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

FatDaz wrote:I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

Your avatar doesn't seem to share your opinion. It's wearing a blue hat too.

EDIT: strawberry float.

Hexx wrote:
Drumstick wrote:Four PMs already.

One could say this is a very strong attempt to look part of a "pro member" group...

It's almost suspicious...

I like the way you think.
However, you did pull the wool over my eyes in a previous game...

MCN wrote:
FatDaz wrote:I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

*looks at avatar*

You can trust me im a copper! :shifty:

FatDaz wrote:I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

"I have a gun now..."

*shoots into a crowd of 90 people*

"DIE BLUEHATS DIE!"

FatDaz wrote:
MCN wrote:
FatDaz wrote:I hope if there is a vigilante role it doesnt get revealed until later on. The need to shoot off straight away ALWAYS leads to doom for the good guys!

*looks at avatar*

You can trust me im a copper!

KILL HIM!

Does anybody recall anybody that has a particular way of playing this game, regarding posting habits and suchlike? If we can find something that strays from the norm, maybe they have a special role.

MEGATON INCOMING

Riddle me this.

Question- What's the diffence between a blue hat and

Answer- Nothing

PS Gorrable is a maybe.

Question: When we ban someone, do we find out if we were right about them being a bluehat? Never played this before y'see.

Hoping to strike it lucky again eh, Mori?

Are You A Bluehat? - The End PG.590

Who is online

Affiliates